A4-6300 vs Xeon E5-1620 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620 v2
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
4.12
+358%
A4-6300
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.90

Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms A4-6300 by a whopping 358% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13882535
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.05no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.001.31
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$315no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FM2
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon™ HD 8370D
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 4.12
+358%
A4-6300 0.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 6550
+359%
A4-6300 1426

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 648
+64.5%
A4-6300 394

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 2392
+326%
A4-6300 561

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.12 0.90
Recency 1 September 2013 1 June 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 v2 has a 357.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

A4-6300, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 v2 is a server/workstation processor while A4-6300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v2 and A4-6300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Xeon E5-1620 v2
AMD A4-6300
A4-6300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 112 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 281 vote

Rate A4-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v2 or A4-6300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.