EPYC 9375F vs Xeon E5-1603

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1852not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.59no data
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,306

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.8 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.6V - 1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA2011SP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066DDR5
Maximum memory size375 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth31.4 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2012 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon E5-1603 has 146.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1603 and EPYC 9375F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1603
Xeon E5-1603
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1603 or EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.