EPYC 9634 vs Xeon E5-1410 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1410 v2
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.57
EPYC 9634
2022
84 cores / 168 threads, 290 Watt
67.38
+1787%

EPYC 9634 outperforms Xeon E5-1410 v2 by a whopping 1787% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1410 v2 and EPYC 9634 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking155011
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.13
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.2522.11
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date9 January 2014 (11 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,304

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1410 v2 and EPYC 9634 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)84
Threads8168
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data22.5
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size257 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,860 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.65-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1410 v2 and EPYC 9634 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket1356SP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1410 v2 and EPYC 9634. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1410 v2 and EPYC 9634 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1410 v2 and EPYC 9634 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1410 v2 and EPYC 9634. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size384 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1410 v2 and EPYC 9634.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes24128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon E5-1410 v2 3.57
EPYC 9634 67.38
+1787%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1410 v2 5715
EPYC 9634 107944
+1789%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.57 67.38
Recency 9 January 2014 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 84
Threads 8 168
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 290 Watt

Xeon E5-1410 v2 has 262.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9634, on the other hand, has a 1787.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 2000% more physical cores and 2000% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9634 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1410 v2 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2
Xeon E5-1410 v2
AMD EPYC 9634
EPYC 9634

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1410 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9634 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon E5-1410 v2 and EPYC 9634, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.