i9-9900 vs Xeon E3-1575M v5

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1575M v5
2016
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.95
Core i9-9900
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.38
+110%

Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1225743
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.798.52
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Core i9
Power efficiency10.4115.11
Architecture codenameSkylake-H (2015−2016)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date24 January 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,207$439

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-9900 has 978% better value for money than Xeon E3-1575M v5.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier30no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size171 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors2,300 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
eDRAM128 MBno data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
Smart Response+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX++
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580Intel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memory64 GB64 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1.2 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.44.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1575M v5 4.95
i9-9900 10.38
+110%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1575M v5 7857
i9-9900 16488
+110%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1575M v5 1376
i9-9900 1596
+16%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1575M v5 4635
i9-9900 7199
+55.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.95 10.38
Integrated graphics card 5.24 3.09
Recency 24 January 2016 23 April 2019
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1575M v5 has 69.6% faster integrated GPU, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

i9-9900, on the other hand, has a 109.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i9-9900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1575M v5 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1575M v5 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-9900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1575M v5 and Core i9-9900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
Xeon E3-1575M v5
Intel Core i9-9900
Core i9-9900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1575M v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 384 votes

Rate Core i9-9900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1575M v5 or Core i9-9900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.