Xeon Gold 5512U vs E3-1505L v6

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1505L v6
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
3.91
Xeon Gold 5512U
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 185 Watt
38.73
+891%

Xeon Gold 5512U outperforms Xeon E3-1505L v6 by a whopping 891% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1505L v6 and Xeon Gold 5512U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking145780
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7197.21
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Power efficiency14.5319.44
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$433$1,230

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5512U has 5585% better value for money than Xeon E3-1505L v6.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1505L v6 and Xeon Gold 5512U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads856
Base clock speedno data2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB52.5 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data89 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1505L v6 and Xeon Gold 5512U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1505L v6 and Xeon Gold 5512U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1505L v6 and Xeon Gold 5512U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1505L v6 and Xeon Gold 5512U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1505L v6 and Xeon Gold 5512U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics P630N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1505L v6 and Xeon Gold 5512U.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1680

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1505L v6 3.91
Xeon Gold 5512U 38.73
+891%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1505L v6 6088
Xeon Gold 5512U 60365
+892%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.91 38.73
Recency 3 January 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 28
Threads 8 56
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon E3-1505L v6 has 640% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5512U, on the other hand, has a 890.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5512U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1505L v6 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1505L v6 and Xeon Gold 5512U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1505L v6
Xeon E3-1505L v6
Intel Xeon Gold 5512U
Xeon Gold 5512U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E3-1505L v6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5512U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1505L v6 or Xeon Gold 5512U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.