Apple M4 (8 cores) vs Xeon E3-1501M v6
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon E3 | Apple M4 |
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | no data |
| Release date | 12 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 28 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 29 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores) are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics P630 | Apple M4 8-core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores).
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 June 2017 | 28 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 5 Watt |
Apple M4 (8 cores) has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E3-1501M v6 is a mobile workstation processor while Apple M4 (8 cores) is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1501M v6 and Apple M4 (8 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
