Atom x7405C vs Xeon E3-1501L v6
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon E3 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | 12 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $57 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 21 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics P630 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 June 2017 | 8 April 2024 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 12 Watt |
Xeon E3-1501L v6 has 100% more threads.
Atom x7405C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E3-1501L v6 is a mobile workstation processor while Atom x7405C is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1501L v6 and Atom x7405C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
