Atom x7-E3950 vs Xeon E3-1290

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1290
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.42
+192%
Atom x7-E3950
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.17

Xeon E3-1290 outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by a whopping 192% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1290 and Atom x7-E3950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15502354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.49no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency3.419.23
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date29 May 2011 (13 years ago)26 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$885$57

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1290 and Atom x7-E3950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature57 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1290 and Atom x7-E3950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA1155Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1290 and Atom x7-E3950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1290 and Atom x7-E3950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1290 and Atom x7-E3950 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1290 and Atom x7-E3950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 505

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1290 and Atom x7-E3950.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes204

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1290 3.42
+192%
Atom x7-E3950 1.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1290 5429
+191%
Atom x7-E3950 1864

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1290 698
+202%
Atom x7-E3950 231

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1290 2869
+300%
Atom x7-E3950 718

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.42 1.17
Recency 29 May 2011 26 October 2016
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 12 Watt

Xeon E3-1290 has a 192.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Atom x7-E3950, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 691.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1290 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-E3950 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1290 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7-E3950 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1290 and Atom x7-E3950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1290
Xeon E3-1290
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1290 or Atom x7-E3950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.