EPYC 9475F vs Xeon E3-1285 v4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1244not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.90no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-DT (2015)Turin (2024)
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,592

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads896
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size160 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1150SP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
eDRAM128 MBno data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
FDI+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Pro P6300N/A
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2015 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 48
Threads 8 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon E3-1285 v4 has 321.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1285 v4 and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1285 v4
Xeon E3-1285 v4
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 11 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1285 v4 or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.