Xeon E7-8895 v2 vs E3-1285 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1285 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 84 Watt
4.47
Xeon E7-8895 v2
2014
15 cores / 30 threads, 155 Watt
36.67
+720%

Xeon E7-8895 v2 outperforms Xeon E3-1285 v3 by a whopping 720% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1338100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.9421.97
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)no data
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)15 (Pentadeca-Core)
Threads830
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)37.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data67 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketFCLGA1150no data
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
PAEno data46 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x+no data
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size32 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4600no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1632

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1285 v3 4.47
Xeon E7-8895 v2 36.67
+720%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1285 v3 6974
Xeon E7-8895 v2 57165
+720%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.47 36.67
Recency 2 June 2013 1 January 2014
Physical cores 4 15
Threads 8 30
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 155 Watt

Xeon E3-1285 v3 has 84.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8895 v2, on the other hand, has a 720.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, and 275% more physical cores and 275% more threads.

The Xeon E7-8895 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1285 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E7-8895 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1285 v3
Xeon E3-1285 v3
Intel Xeon E7-8895 v2
Xeon E7-8895 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 14 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 116 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8895 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1285 v3 or Xeon E7-8895 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.