Xeon E3-1225 v2 vs E3-1285 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1285 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 84 Watt
4.56
+46.6%

Xeon E3-1285 v3 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 v2 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13321630
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.66
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.953.68
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)14 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$200

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2160 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt77 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection++
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32.77 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4600Intel HD P4000
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz1.25 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1285 v3 4.56
+46.6%
Xeon E3-1225 v2 3.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1285 v3 6974
+46.8%
Xeon E3-1225 v2 4752

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.56 3.11
Recency 2 June 2013 14 May 2012
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 77 Watt

Xeon E3-1285 v3 has a 46.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more threads.

Xeon E3-1225 v2, on the other hand, has 9.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1285 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1225 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1285 v3 and Xeon E3-1225 v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1285 v3
Xeon E3-1285 v3
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v2
Xeon E3-1225 v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 14 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1285 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 221 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1225 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1285 v3 or Xeon E3-1225 v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.