Xeon D-1537 vs E3-1280

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1280
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.61
Xeon D-1537
2015
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
4.78
+32.4%

Xeon D-1537 outperforms Xeon E3-1280 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 and Xeon D-1537 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15171271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.051.83
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon D
Power efficiency3.5312.68
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 November 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$470

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon D-1537 has 74% better value for money than Xeon E3-1280.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 and Xeon D-1537 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm2246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 and Xeon D-1537 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA1155FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Xeon D-1537. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
GPIOno data+
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 and Xeon D-1537 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Xeon D-1537 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Xeon D-1537. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Xeon D-1537.

PCIe version2.02.0/3.0
PCI Express lanes2024
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1280 3.61
Xeon D-1537 4.78
+32.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1280 5623
Xeon D-1537 7444
+32.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.61 4.78
Recency 3 April 2011 1 November 2015
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon D-1537 has a 32.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon D-1537 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1280 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 and Xeon D-1537, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280
Xeon E3-1280
Intel Xeon D-1537
Xeon D-1537

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 54 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon D-1537 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 or Xeon D-1537, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.