Opteron 142 vs Xeon E3-1280

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1517not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.03no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.53no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)September 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size216 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155940
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1280 5623
+1214%
Opteron 142 428

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon E3-1280 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 142, on the other hand, has 11.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 and Opteron 142, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280
Xeon E3-1280
AMD Opteron 142
Opteron 142

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 54 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 6 votes

Rate Opteron 142 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 or Opteron 142, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.