Celeron N2805 vs Xeon E3-1280

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1517not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.05no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.53no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$450$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.46 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C80 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Smart Connectno data+
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes204
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1280 5623
+1579%
Celeron N2805 335

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2011 11 September 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 4 Watt

Xeon E3-1280 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron N2805, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 2275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1280 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N2805 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 and Celeron N2805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280
Xeon E3-1280
Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 54 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 98 votes

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 or Celeron N2805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.