Celeron G3900 vs Xeon E3-1280 v5

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1280 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.29
+292%
Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.35

Xeon E3-1280 v5 outperforms Celeron G3900 by a whopping 292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11752241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.790.18
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency6.262.51
Architecture codenameSkylake-S (2015)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$612$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 has 894% better value for money than Celeron G3900.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3728
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2150 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 510
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/A4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPN/A4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/A4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/AN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/A12
OpenGLN/A4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 5.29
+292%
Celeron G3900 1.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 8407
+291%
Celeron G3900 2151

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 1297
+122%
Celeron G3900 585

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 4430
+343%
Celeron G3900 1001

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.29 1.35
Recency 19 October 2015 1 September 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 51 Watt

Xeon E3-1280 v5 has a 291.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G3900, on the other hand, has 56.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1280 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1280 v5 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G3900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Celeron G3900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
Xeon E3-1280 v5
Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 20 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 223 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 v5 or Celeron G3900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.