Atom D525 vs Xeon E3-1280 v5

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1173not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.80no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Atom
Power efficiency6.26no data
Architecture codenameSkylake-S (2015)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$612$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size122 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 8407
+1991%
Atom D525 402

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 1297
+1584%
Atom D525 77

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 4430
+2269%
Atom D525 187

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 8470
+851%
Atom D525 891

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 9.5
+482%
Atom D525 55.25

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Xeon E3-1280 v5 9
+1463%
Atom D525 1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2015 21 June 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 13 Watt

Xeon E3-1280 v5 has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 515.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1280 v5 is a server/workstation processor while Atom D525 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 v5 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
Xeon E3-1280 v5
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 19 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 216 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 v5 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.