i3-380M vs Xeon E3-1280 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1280 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 82 Watt
4.74
+516%
Core i3-380M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.77

Xeon E3-1280 v3 outperforms Core i3-380M by a whopping 516% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12762644
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency5.372.04
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)26 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$800$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.53 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data19
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA
Number of transistors1,400 million382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1150BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)82 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17.051 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1280 v3 4.74
+516%
i3-380M 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1280 v3 7393
+517%
i3-380M 1199

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1280 v3 1215
+267%
i3-380M 331

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1280 v3 3881
+498%
i3-380M 649

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.74 0.77
Recency 2 June 2013 26 September 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 82 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E3-1280 v3 has a 515.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

i3-380M, on the other hand, has 134.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1280 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-380M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1280 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-380M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1280 v3 and Core i3-380M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Intel Core i3-380M
Core i3-380M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 42 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1280 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 454 votes

Rate Core i3-380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1280 v3 or Core i3-380M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.