i9-13900KS vs Xeon E3-1275 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1275 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 77 Watt
4.25
Core i9-13900KS
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
39.51
+830%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 by a whopping 830% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking138074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.8352.69
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.1324.46
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)12 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$808$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900KS has 6248% better value for money than Xeon E3-1275 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size160 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32.77 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4000Intel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1275 v2 4.25
i9-13900KS 39.51
+830%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1275 v2 6620
i9-13900KS 61580
+830%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1275 v2 646
i9-13900KS 3135
+385%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1275 v2 2256
i9-13900KS 21718
+863%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.25 39.51
Recency 14 May 2012 12 January 2023
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 32
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon E3-1275 v2 has 94.8% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KS, on the other hand, has a 829.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 500% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Core i9-13900KS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1275 v2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1275 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900KS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1275 v2 and Core i9-13900KS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Intel Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 215 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1275 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 830 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1275 v2 or Core i9-13900KS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.