Celeron J4105 vs Xeon E3-1270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1270
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.37
+84.2%
Celeron J4105
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
1.83

Xeon E3-1270 outperforms Celeron J4105 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15611996
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.242.11
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.9917.32
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4105 has 70% better value for money than Xeon E3-1270.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm293 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA1155FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes206
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1270 3.37
+84.2%
Celeron J4105 1.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1270 5350
+84.3%
Celeron J4105 2903

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1270 616
+89.5%
Celeron J4105 325

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1270 2071
+124%
Celeron J4105 923

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.37 1.83
Recency 3 April 2011 11 December 2017
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E3-1270 has a 84.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron J4105, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1270 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4105 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1270 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J4105 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron J4105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270
Xeon E3-1270
Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1007 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 303 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1270 or Celeron J4105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.