Celeron G540 vs Xeon E3-1270

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1270
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.37
+355%
Celeron G540
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.74

Xeon E3-1270 outperforms Celeron G540 by a whopping 355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15592658
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.130.01
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.991.08
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369$158

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1270 has 11200% better value for money than Celeron G540.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C69 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-+
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1270 3.37
+355%
Celeron G540 0.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1270 5350
+353%
Celeron G540 1182

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1270 616
+55.2%
Celeron G540 397

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1270 2071
+203%
Celeron G540 683

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.37 0.74
Recency 3 April 2011 4 September 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1270 has a 355.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G540, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1270 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G540 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1270 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G540 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1270 and Celeron G540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1270
Xeon E3-1270
Intel Celeron G540
Celeron G540

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1007 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 106 votes

Rate Celeron G540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1270 or Celeron G540, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.