A4-4000 vs Xeon E3-1265L v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1265L v4
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
4.46
+503%
A4-4000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.74

Xeon E3-1265L v4 outperforms A4-4000 by a whopping 503% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13422685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency11.841.06
Architecture codenameBroadwell-DT (2015)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size182 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
eDRAM128 MBno data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Iris Pro P6300AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 4.46
+503%
A4-4000 0.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1265L v4 6954
+507%
A4-4000 1146

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.46 0.74
Recency 2 June 2015 1 June 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1265L v4 has a 502.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1265L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1265L v4 is a server/workstation processor while A4-4000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v4 and A4-4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v4
Xeon E3-1265L v4
AMD A4-4000
A4-4000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 356 votes

Rate A4-4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v4 or A4-4000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.