VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 vs Xeon E3-1265L v2

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1584not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.76no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataVIA
Power efficiency6.81no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)CNQ (2011)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)17 May 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s1333 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm40 nm
Die size160 mm2132 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155BGA
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt27.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32.77 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.

PCIe version3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2012 17 May 2011
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 27 Watt

Xeon E3-1265L v2 has an age advantage of 11 months, 100% more threads, and a 81.8% more advanced lithography process.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1265L v2 is a server/workstation processor while VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1265L v2 and VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
Xeon E3-1265L v2
VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 42 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1265L v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1265L v2 or VIA Nano QuadCore L4700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.