i3-3250 vs Xeon E3-1260L

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1260L
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
2.61
+66.2%
Core i3-3250
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.57

Xeon E3-1260L outperforms Core i3-3250 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17302120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.540.15
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.392.65
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)9 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150$138

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1260L has 927% better value for money than i3-3250.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size216 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature59 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI++
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data-
Identity Protection++
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 2000Intel HD Graphics 2500
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1260L 2.61
+66.2%
i3-3250 1.57

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1260L 4073
+66.8%
i3-3250 2442

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1260L 457
i3-3250 581
+27.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1260L 1484
+26%
i3-3250 1178

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.61 1.57
Integrated graphics card 0.55 0.69
Recency 3 April 2011 9 June 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon E3-1260L has a 66.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

i3-3250, on the other hand, has 25.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E3-1260L is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1260L is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-3250 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1260L and Core i3-3250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1260L
Xeon E3-1260L
Intel Core i3-3250
Core i3-3250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 262 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1260L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 198 votes

Rate Core i3-3250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1260L or Core i3-3250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.