Apple M2 Pro vs Xeon E3-1241 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1241 v3
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.50
Apple M2 Pro
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 2424 Watt
13.70
+204%

Apple M2 Pro outperforms Xeon E3-1241 v3 by a whopping 204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1241 v3 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1310536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.04no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency5.32no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)no data
Release date11 May 2014 (10 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$273no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1241 v3 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)3.3 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)36 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)24 MB
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,400 million40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1241 v3 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1150no data
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt2424 ‑ 3504 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1241 v3 and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1241 v3 and Apple M2 Pro technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1241 v3 and Apple M2 Pro are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1241 v3 and Apple M2 Pro. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1241 v3 and Apple M2 Pro.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1241 v3 4.50
Apple M2 Pro 13.70
+204%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1241 v3 7144
Apple M2 Pro 21755
+205%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.50 13.70
Recency 11 May 2014 17 January 2023
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 2424 Watt

Xeon E3-1241 v3 has 2930% lower power consumption.

Apple M2 Pro, on the other hand, has a 204.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M2 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1241 v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1241 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1241 v3 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3
Xeon E3-1241 v3
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 129 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1241 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 181 vote

Rate Apple M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1241 v3 or Apple M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.