EPYC 9175F vs Xeon E3-1240L v3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1514not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.69no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency13.48no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Turin (2024)
Release date11 May 2014 (10 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$278$4,256

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size160 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1150SP5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 May 2014 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon E3-1240L v3 has 1180% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240L v3 and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240L v3
Xeon E3-1240L v3
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 12 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240L v3 or EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.