A10-6800K vs Xeon E3-1240

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1554	1920
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.04	0.27
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Series	no data	AMD A-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency	4.02	1.90
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Richland (2013−2014)
Release date	3 April 2011 (13 years ago)	1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$209	$142

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 has 656% better value for money than A10-6800K.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	8	4
Base clock speed	3.3 GHz	4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.7 GHz	4.4 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	192 KB
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	4096 KB
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	216 mm2	246 mm2
Maximum core temperature	69 °C	74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	74 °C
Number of transistors	1,160 million	1,303 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	LGA1155	FM2
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	no data
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	-	+
AVX	+	+
PowerNow	-	+
PowerGating	-	+
VirusProtect	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
FDI	-	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Identity Protection	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data
IOMMU 2.0	-	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	21 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	no data	AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Number of pipelines	no data	384
Enduro	-	+
Switchable graphics	-	+
UVD	-	+
VCE	-	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	-	+
HDMI	-	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX

no data

DirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	20	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	3.40	2.01
Recency	3 April 2011	1 June 2013
Threads	8	4
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	100 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 and A10-6800K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---