Xeon Bronze 3106 vs E3-1240 v5

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.20
+43.6%
Xeon Bronze 3106
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
3.62

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Xeon Bronze 3106 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11871490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.754.19
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3Intel Xeon Bronze
Power efficiency6.154.03
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$282$306

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Bronze 3106 has 12% better value for money than Xeon E3-1240 v5.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3517
L1 cache256 KB512 KB
L2 cache1 MB8 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)11 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data77 °C
Number of transistors1,750 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151,FCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size64 GB768 GB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.20
+43.6%
Xeon Bronze 3106 3.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 8254
+43.5%
Xeon Bronze 3106 5753

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 1319
+128%
Xeon Bronze 3106 579

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 4341
+37.8%
Xeon Bronze 3106 3151

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.20 3.62
Recency 19 October 2015 11 July 2017
Physical cores 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has a 43.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 6.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3106, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Bronze 3106 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Xeon Bronze 3106, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Intel Xeon Bronze 3106
Xeon Bronze 3106

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 162 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v5 or Xeon Bronze 3106, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.