Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.20
+18.5%
Ryzen 3 1300X
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.39

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Ryzen 3 1300X by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12001352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.953.97
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency6.156.39
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$282$129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 1300X has 1% better value for money than Xeon E3-1240 v5.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3534
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size122 mm2213 mm2
Number of transistors1,750 million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151,FCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/A-
Clear Video--
Clear Video HD--
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support--
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/A-
Max resolution over eDPN/A-
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/A-
Max resolution over VGAN/A-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/A-
OpenGLN/A-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.20
+18.5%
Ryzen 3 1300X 4.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 8262
+18.6%
Ryzen 3 1300X 6969

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 1322
+20.1%
Ryzen 3 1300X 1101

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 4330
+38.6%
Ryzen 3 1300X 3125

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.20 4.39
Recency 19 October 2015 27 July 2017
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has a 18.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 1300X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 1300X in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v5 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 1300X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Ryzen 3 1300X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
Ryzen 3 1300X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 184 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 278 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 1300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v5 or Ryzen 3 1300X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.