EPYC 9654 vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.20
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
75.73
+1356%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 by a whopping 1356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.751.29
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3AMD EPYC
Power efficiency6.1519.91
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$282$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has 191% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads8192
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3524
L1 cache256 KB6 MB
L2 cache1 MB96 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size122 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors1,750 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA1151,FCLGA2011SP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.20
EPYC 9654 75.73
+1356%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 8254
EPYC 9654 120295
+1357%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 1319
EPYC 9654 1827
+38.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 4341
EPYC 9654 18626
+329%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.20 75.73
Recency 19 October 2015 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 8 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 360 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has 350% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 1356.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 v5 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 162 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v5 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.