Celeron N2807 vs Xeon E3-1240 v5
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1182 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.84 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | Intel Xeon E3 | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 6.16 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake-DT (2015) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
Release date | 19 October 2015 (9 years ago) | 23 February 2014 (10 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $282 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.58 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 35 | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 56K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 122 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,750 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1151,FCLGA2011 | FCBGA1170 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 4.3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
TSX | + | - |
Idle States | + | + |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Connect | no data | + |
RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | + |
MPX | + | - |
SGX | Yes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | - |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 4 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 1 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video HD | - | - |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 750 MHz |
InTru 3D | - | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | N/A | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | N/A | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | N/A | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | N/A | no data |
OpenGL | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 4 |
USB revision | no data | 3.0 and 2.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 19 October 2015 | 23 February 2014 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 4 Watt |
Xeon E3-1240 v5 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron N2807, on the other hand, has 1900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v5 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N2807 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron N2807, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.