Celeron G1610 vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.40
+445%

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms Celeron G1610 by a whopping 445% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11822488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.840.01
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Power efficiency6.161.64
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)3 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$282$388

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has 38300% better value for money than Celeron G1610.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size122 mm294 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors1,750 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151,FCLGA2011FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+-
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.40
+445%
Celeron G1610 0.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 8257
+444%
Celeron G1610 1519

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 1315
+222%
Celeron G1610 408

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 4332
+542%
Celeron G1610 675

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.40 0.99
Recency 19 October 2015 3 December 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has a 445.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron G1610, on the other hand, has 45.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1610 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v5 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G1610 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and Celeron G1610, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5
Intel Celeron G1610
Celeron G1610

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 160 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 234 votes

Rate Celeron G1610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v5 or Celeron G1610, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.