A8-9600 vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.22
+150%
A8-9600
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.09

Xeon E3-1240 v5 outperforms A8-9600 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11871880
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.7614.13
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E3no data
Power efficiency6.153.03
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$282$78

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-9600 has 276% better value for money than Xeon E3-1240 v5.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB2048 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size122 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,750 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151,FCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/ADirectX® 12
OpenGLN/Ano data
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.22
+150%
A8-9600 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 8254
+149%
A8-9600 3312

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 1318
+115%
A8-9600 612

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 4329
+188%
A8-9600 1502

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.22 2.09
Recency 19 October 2015 27 July 2017
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has a 149.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A8-9600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-9600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v5 is a server/workstation processor while A8-9600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and A8-9600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5
AMD A8-9600
A8-9600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 162 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 982 votes

Rate A8-9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v5 or A8-9600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.