i7-970 vs Xeon E3-1240 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
4.00
Core i7-970
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.12
+3%

Core i7-970 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14251400
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.140.32
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.493.00
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Gulftown (2010−2011)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)19 July 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304$662

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 has 569% better value for money than i7-970.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.46 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s4.8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2239 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data36 Bit
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32.77 GB24 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 4.00
i7-970 4.12
+3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 6361
i7-970 6546
+2.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 664
+33.6%
i7-970 497

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 2309
+1%
i7-970 2287

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.00 4.12
Recency 14 May 2012 19 July 2010
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 130 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v2 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 88.4% lower power consumption.

i7-970, on the other hand, has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-970 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Core i7-970, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Intel Core i7-970
Core i7-970

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 1004 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 68 votes

Rate Core i7-970 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v2 or Core i7-970, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.