Atom x7-E3950 vs Xeon E3-1240 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
4.12
+240%

Xeon E3-1240 v2 outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by a whopping 240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom x7-E3950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13872323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.43no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno data7x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)26 October 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304$57

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom x7-E3950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data103 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom x7-E3950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom x7-E3950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom x7-E3950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom x7-E3950 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom x7-E3950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32.77 GB8 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 505

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom x7-E3950.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 4.12
+240%
Atom x7-E3950 1.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 6358
+241%
Atom x7-E3950 1864

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 667
+189%
Atom x7-E3950 231

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 2323
+224%
Atom x7-E3950 718

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.12 1.21
Recency 14 May 2012 26 October 2016
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 12 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v2 has a 240.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Atom x7-E3950, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 475% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1240 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-E3950 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x7-E3950 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom x7-E3950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 941 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 46 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v2 or Atom x7-E3950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.