Atom D410 vs Xeon E3-1240 v2

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.02no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency5.49no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$304$636

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data32 Bit
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size32.77 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v2 6359
+3433%
Atom D410 180

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2012 4 January 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v2 has an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D410, on the other hand, has 590% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Atom D410 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v2 and Atom D410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
Xeon E3-1240 v2
Intel Atom D410
Atom D410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 985 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 121 vote

Rate Atom D410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v2 or Atom D410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.