Atom D2560 vs Xeon E3-1235

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1599not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.31no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.17no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)24 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$287no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)1 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.91V -1.21V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA1155FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size32 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P3000Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes204

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1235 5053
+1067%
Atom D2560 433

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2011 24 October 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon E3-1235 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom D2560, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 850% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1235 is a server/workstation processor while Atom D2560 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1235 and Atom D2560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1235
Xeon E3-1235
Intel Atom D2560
Atom D2560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 24 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom D2560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1235 or Atom D2560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.