A4-7210 vs Xeon E3-1235

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1235
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.19
+207%
A4-7210
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.04

Xeon E3-1235 outperforms A4-7210 by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16022429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.29no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency3.183.94
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Carrizo-L (2015)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)7 May 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$287no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million930 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA1155FT3b
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt12-25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P3000AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1235 3.19
+207%
A4-7210 1.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1235 5068
+206%
A4-7210 1656

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1235 588
+193%
A4-7210 201

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1235 1995
+282%
A4-7210 522

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.19 1.04
Recency 3 April 2011 7 May 2015
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 12 Watt

Xeon E3-1235 has a 206.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

A4-7210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 691.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1235 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-7210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1235 is a server/workstation processor while A4-7210 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1235 and A4-7210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1235
Xeon E3-1235
AMD A4-7210
A4-7210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 24 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 160 votes

Rate A4-7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1235 or A4-7210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.