Atom N470 vs Xeon E3-1230

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1594not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.89no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.82no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$428$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.83 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size216 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million123 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+-
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size32 GB2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1230 5137
+2193%
Atom N470 224

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2011 1 March 2010
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E3-1230 has an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N470, on the other hand, has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1230 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N470 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 and Atom N470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230
Xeon E3-1230
Intel Atom N470
Atom N470

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 185 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 37 votes

Rate Atom N470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 or Atom N470, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.