Xeon Gold 6416H vs E3-1230 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1230 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
3.90
Xeon Gold 6416H
2023
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
25.56
+555%

Xeon Gold 6416H outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v2 by a whopping 555% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 6416H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1441191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.5949.43
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.3514.66
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$360$1,444

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6416H has 3009% better value for money than Xeon E3-1230 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 6416H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads836
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)45 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 6416H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 6416H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 6416H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Identity Protection+-
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 6416H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 6416H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size32.77 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 6416H.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 v2 3.90
Xeon Gold 6416H 25.56
+555%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1230 v2 6198
Xeon Gold 6416H 40606
+555%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.90 25.56
Recency 14 May 2012 10 January 2023
Physical cores 4 18
Threads 8 36
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon E3-1230 v2 has 139.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6416H, on the other hand, has a 555.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 350% more physical cores and 350% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6416H is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1230 v2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Xeon Gold 6416H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
Xeon E3-1230 v2
Intel Xeon Gold 6416H
Xeon Gold 6416H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2719 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6416H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 v2 or Xeon Gold 6416H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.