Celeron G460 vs Xeon E3-1225

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1750not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.41no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.45no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)12 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150$65

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)1.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C66 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P3000Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1225 3905
+733%
Celeron G460 469

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1225 568
+99.3%
Celeron G460 285

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1225 1691
+339%
Celeron G460 385

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2011 12 December 2011
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E3-1225 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G460, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1225 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G460 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1225 and Celeron G460, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1225
Xeon E3-1225
Intel Celeron G460
Celeron G460

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 64 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 30 votes

Rate Celeron G460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1225 or Celeron G460, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.