Atom N2800 vs Xeon E3-1225 v3

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.76no data
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$384$47

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm266 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)84 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB4.88 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4600Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1225 v3 5301
+1094%
Atom N2800 444

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2013 1 December 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 84 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E3-1225 v3 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N2800, on the other hand, has 1300% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1225 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N2800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1225 v3 and Atom N2800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 127 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1225 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 104 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1225 v3 or Atom N2800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.