Celeron G6900E vs Xeon E3-1220L
Aggregate performance score
Celeron G6900E outperforms Xeon E3-1220L by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron G6900E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2245 | 1771 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 6.81 | 5.51 |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
Release date | 3 April 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron G6900E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron G6900E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1155 | 1700 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 46 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron G6900E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
FDI | - | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron G6900E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron G6900E are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron G6900E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 710 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron G6900E.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.43 | 2.66 |
Recency | 3 April 2011 | 4 January 2022 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 46 Watt |
Xeon E3-1220L has 100% more threads, and 130% lower power consumption.
Celeron G6900E, on the other hand, has a 86% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron G6900E is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1220L in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E3-1220L is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G6900E is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.