Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Xeon E3-1220L

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1220L
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 20 Watt
1.45
+142%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.60

Xeon E3-1220L outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21722791
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency6.831.62
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size131 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron Dual-Core T1600.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1220L 1.45
+142%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 0.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1220L 2295
+142%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 950

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.45 0.60
Recency 3 April 2011 1 May 2008
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E3-1220L has a 141.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 75% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1220L is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1220L is a server/workstation processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1220L and Celeron Dual-Core T1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1220L
Xeon E3-1220L
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 13 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1220L or Celeron Dual-Core T1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.