i3-6100E vs Xeon E3-1220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1220
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
2.42
+15.8%
Core i3-6100E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.09

Xeon E3-1220 outperforms Core i3-6100E by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1220 and Core i3-6100E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17781892
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.580.24
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency2.865.65
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)12 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1220 has 142% better value for money than i3-6100E.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1220 and Core i3-6100E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,160 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1220 and Core i3-6100E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1220 and Core i3-6100E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1220 and Core i3-6100E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1220 and Core i3-6100E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1220 and Core i3-6100E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 530

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1220 and Core i3-6100E.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1220 2.42
+15.8%
i3-6100E 2.09

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1220 3847
+16%
i3-6100E 3315

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.42 2.09
Recency 3 April 2011 12 October 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E3-1220 has a 15.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

i3-6100E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-6100E in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1220 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-6100E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1220 and Core i3-6100E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1220
Xeon E3-1220
Intel Core i3-6100E
Core i3-6100E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 232 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-6100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1220 or Core i3-6100E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.