Celeron M 530 vs Xeon E3-1220

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1761not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.52no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency2.87no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size216 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature69 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA1155PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+-
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1220 3847
+1174%
Celeron M 530 302

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 30 Watt

Xeon E3-1220 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 530, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1220 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 530 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1220 and Celeron M 530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1220
Xeon E3-1220
Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 231 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1220 or Celeron M 530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.