Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS vs Xeon E-2478
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E-2478 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E-2478 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 314 | 530 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 82.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 22.22 | 46.91 |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Hawk Point (2024) |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) | 16 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $568 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2478 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 16 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2478 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1700 | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2478 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2478 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2478 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2478 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5-4800 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 760M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2478 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS.
| PCIe version | 5 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.78 | 13.88 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 16 April 2024 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 28 Watt |
Xeon E-2478 has a 35.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 185.7% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E-2478 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2478 and Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
