Ultra 7 265K vs Xeon E-2468

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2468
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.82
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
38.24
+127%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Xeon E-2468 by a whopping 127% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2468 and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking39383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation92.9290.97
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency24.0328.41
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$426$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2468 has 2% better value for money than Ultra 7 265K.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2468 and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate16 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Die size257 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2468 and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA17001851
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E-2468 and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe version55.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2468 16.82
Ultra 7 265K 38.24
+127%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2468 26221
Ultra 7 265K 59601
+127%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.82 38.24
Recency 14 December 2023 24 October 2024
Physical cores 8 20
Threads 16 20
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E-2468 has 92.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 127.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2468 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2468 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2468 and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2468 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 59 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2468 or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.