Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Xeon E-2314

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2314
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
5.13
+142%
Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.12

Xeon E-2314 outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1600 by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12001866
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency7.478.03
Architecture codenameRocket Lake-E (2021)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date8 September 2021 (3 years ago)25 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.8 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1600.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes448

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2314 5.13
+142%
Ryzen Embedded R1600 2.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2314 8146
+142%
Ryzen Embedded R1600 3365

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.13 2.12
Recency 8 September 2021 25 February 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon E-2314 has a 142% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores.

Ryzen Embedded R1600, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2314 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2314 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded R1600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2314 and Ryzen Embedded R1600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2314
Xeon E-2314
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
Ryzen Embedded R1600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon E-2314 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 33 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2314 or Ryzen Embedded R1600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.