Ryzen Embedded V1807B vs Xeon E-2278GEL
Aggregate performance score
Xeon E-2278GEL outperforms Ryzen Embedded V1807B by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E-2278GEL and Ryzen Embedded V1807B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 974 | 1171 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 16.64 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 20.43 | 11.29 |
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 11 June 2019 (5 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $519 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2278GEL and Ryzen Embedded V1807B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 33.5 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 210 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2278GEL and Ryzen Embedded V1807B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1151 | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2278GEL and Ryzen Embedded V1807B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2278GEL and Ryzen Embedded V1807B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2278GEL and Ryzen Embedded V1807B are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2278GEL and Ryzen Embedded V1807B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2278GEL and Ryzen Embedded V1807B.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.57 | 5.38 |
| Integrated graphics card | 6.40 | 5.48 |
| Recency | 11 June 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon E-2278GEL has a 40.7% higher aggregate performance score, 16.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 28.6% lower power consumption.
The Xeon E-2278GEL is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded V1807B in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon E-2278GEL is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Embedded V1807B is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2278GEL and Ryzen Embedded V1807B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
