Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 vs Xeon E-2278GE
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 781 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 23.66 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 11.71 | no data |
Architecture codename | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) | Strix Halo (2025) |
Release date | 11 June 2019 (5 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $519 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
Threads | 16 | 24 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 5 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 180 mm2 | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | 1151 | FP11 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | Radeon 8050S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 11 June 2019 | 6 January 2025 |
Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
Threads | 16 | 24 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 55 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 has an age advantage of 5 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 45.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E-2278GE is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2278GE and Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.